I have two perfectly good 27" Apple thunderbolt displays that I've been using daisy chained together with my older mac mini.. is this problem unique to the latest mac minis or has the proverbial ship finally sailed on my displays? TFTCentral does pretty thorough reviews, they seem to like the Alienware. And the speakers go from quiet to really loud, with no in-between. Are there quibbles? Also, it has poor motion handling because it has a slow response time. Reddit is not a good measure for what workers who use computers want. It's not hard to beat the notoriously bad build quality and reliability of the LG UltraFine and Apple has a track record of building solid displays (I have an LED Cinema Display that's going on 13 years old with nary a single issue). Resolutions have progressed pretty nicely IMO, but the top end monitors from Dell, Apple etc still all running at 60hz. I'd rather have higher density like the laptop it is connected to, with 4k. What I want is what I have now, two devices connected to the same display. The edges of the screen are a bit darker, but it's not too noticeable, and there's minimal dirty screen effect in the center. Besides the ergonomics and reflection handling, the results are valid for the other variants. > most people accept you'll never sit far enough away from a 65" TV to have the same apparent size as a 27" monitor and settle for "small enough" apparent size. As for the "which is it?" Gamers are a minority of the 120hz panel market. Yes - sometimes things get connected to multiple devices but again - it's a niche. Instead, a daisy chain involves each display being treated completely independently, as if each one was connected directly to its own output. Even better: higher priced laptop had 1920x. Oh, and those had IPS displays unlike apple with (halfway decent) TN panels. The nano-texture coating has a matte finish that the manufacturer advertises to reduce the amount of direct reflections, but it also makes text and images look hazier. As far as I can tell we live in the future and nobody is happy. i.e. The LG also has better connectivity, with Thunderbolt 4 support as well as HDMI and DisplayPort inputs. Yeah I dont know what it is with everyone prioritizing pixels over refresh rate.. once you start using 100+hz 60hz starts to feel like a slide show. You can even rotate the screen into a vertical orientation and the macOS interface automatically rotates, even if this isn't the version with the VESA mount adapter, and you can't use it in a vertical orientation. If you pay 1.5k for a monitor you should be able to expect a stand that doesn't shake if you bump into your table a bit. So everybody else pushed, then apple not only caught up but jumped ahead. Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. Dell's 6 year old 8k UP3218 has entered the chat. Looking at the uproar over at Reddit, it seems like people care far more about refresh rate than resolution or color depth. Clearly leaving it on is the moral option. Yes, blind tests have shown that users are easily able to discern between 60 vs 144hz. macOS draws only at 1x or 2x. Apple drastically simplified the ports with the Studio Display, only including three 10Gb/s USB-C ports. 16k would be nice if that was possible to buy, but this pixel density is good enough for my purposes. Maybe it is because very high end screens did 4K and 5K early and stopped there for a while because at that price it was a niche. It does so by rendering at 200% then downscaling the resulting texture which is absolutely horrendous for both performance and looks. Wish Apple went for a 34 inch, But I'm sure there are economical reasons why that's not done. It's not that the higher frame rate isn't perceptible, but that raising the frame rate doesn't really have any appreciable impact unless people. It's also ugly black plastic compared to the aluminum construction of the Apple display. It easily gets bright enough to fight glare in most bright rooms, and although smaller highlights are a bit dimmer, the difference isn't noticeable. The Studio Display is an additional $300. Can I daisy chain a Mac studio display, an Lg monitor with a MacBook Pro . I can see it now. However, you can't remove either stand, so the monitor can't be wall-mounted, and neither stand can swivel or rotate into portrait mode. Step 4: After the DisplayPort ports successfully connect one cable end to the host output port, leave the other end to the second one. If you've ever tried run Linux, either bare or VM, did it handle dpi correctly? Apple is not interested in releasing a cheap dumb commodity PC-compatible monitor and never will be. Is either full screen or nothing. On a 22" screen, the difference between 4k and 1440p equates to 200dpi and 133dpi respectively - if you can't see the difference between 200dpi and 133dpi, I'm sorry, but you have either poor eyesight or glasses aren't doing their job. Can you daisy chain studio display The exclusion would be a device such as a Cal Digit TS3+ thunderbolt Dock where the Dock should be connected to a Macs thunderbolt bus and its port . And when I say favorite, I mean by an extremely large margin. :(, Apr 18, 2022 3:07 PM in response to olivierLA75 Same. Rocking a couple of LG UF 27 5ks today. The base of the height-adjustable stand is bigger, with a depth of 8.1" (20.7 cm). That suggestion shows up once in a while on HN when people discuss eye strain. Plus, you can use the additional 4k display as an extended macOS display when not gaming. Can you actually connect HDMI input to a thunderbolt only display? Otherwise, if you're willing to settle for affordable retina-quality monitors, this is the one I use: https://camelcamelcamel.com/product/B01LPNKFK0. The reason Windows developers still think it might work is they have no taste and dont care about localized UI, pixel cracks, or blurry bitmap controls. They didn't sell well, apparently. Macs does support non-integer scaling. If I understand your setup correctly, you wish to plug a cable into the USB-C port on to your device. Apple recommends that users connect storages devices to the display's Thunderbolt port rather than connecting the display further down the chain. That sucker costs $3770, just as a data point. But I can understand why they don't allow users to enter a value like 168%. The second display requires a genuine Thunderbolt input, with a data stream faster than 26G bits/sec. Thank you for your response. The laptop is connected to the U2722DE monitor using the USB-C to C cable that came with monitor connected to the Thunderbolt 4 port on the laptop. I've been wishing for just an 27" iMac monitor that I can plug into my laptop, since that's the best non-laptop monitor I've found - even contemplated building a Frankenstein one. I'm not sure whether that will be the case. The problem there is MacOS doesn't support MST. They're standard in high end tablets. We're at the limits of cables and transcivers for reasonable prices. > HDMI 2.1 does support 5K@120Hz@10bpc but requires DSC as you say, which is not very commonly found either. It was clumsy enough the first time. Got 2x5k now but really prefer the 21.5 DCI-4k. I appreciate your comment, it's exactly the kind of stuff I'm picky about while others think I'm mad. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, The Mac Mini supports 2 external displays since it obviously has no built-in display, but the M1 Air and 13" MBP . I haven't tested for color accuracy or HDR. Faster refresh doesn't necessarily mean a better display. I've been using 2 machines with universal control (it works pretty well in the latest betas), and it's quite neat. The Thunderbolt Display also added a Gigabit . So this each Studio Display will require a direct connection to the laptop/desktop in order to work? It's like saying using your hand saw as a flat head screw driver is strictly better because it had a larger handle as long as you can line it up in the screw. Do you know whether the latest MacBook pros with the M1pro chips can power 2 studio displays? Or, the wisdom of HN will yield us some options. If so, I was looking to purchase one myself. You could also mount it on the wall. Sadly, the tilt-only version has limited ergonomics, so it's hard to place in an ideal viewing position. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Apple Studio Display doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. In response to domitrescu, Mar 10, 2022 6:50 AM in response to domitrescu The Apple Studio Display has an okay vertical viewing angle. TVs have techniques to deal with this, either motion smoothing[1] or black frame insertion. That's the wrong approach. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question. I am a monitor snob. A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Ah, I haven't noticed much difference between my 27" iMac and my LG 5k UF's (there's a little), and been tempted to get the XDR, mainly because I was hoping for even better and bigger panel than the 5k ones. As the Studio is a desktop computer, I don't think that it's configured to accept power over the ThunderBolt ports like the portable MacBooks are. macOS Ventura is now available. . [0]: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M74Y03E, [1]: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MQ26QIY, [2]: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07CZPV8DF. It's limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, and it doesn't support any variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing. #3. In response to Jwickster. And even if it wasnt very used, the environmental cost of just one extra monitor would be many many unused ports. The 2013 MacPro also had four USB-A ports, two ethernet ports and a HDMI port. > It gets criticized from time to tome, though the newer 14/16 MBPs ship 200% as default again. I'm very sorry for all the trouble you have had to go through in order to have an 8k 65" screen. MST provides daisy chaining of displays, but can not help you exceed bandwidth limits. Combined with the high peak brightness, you won't have any issues using it in a bright room. For the case, instead of buying 2 32" apple pro monitors buying 3 of the 27 would make it better. Both have fantastic out-of-the-box accuracy with their sRGB modes, but you can only get the sRGB mode on the Apple with a macOS device. AFAIK they're basically two panels side-by-side so sometimes my right-side-one will "blip" for half a second. Apple may provide or recommend responses as a possible solution based on the information I can't be bothered to do the exact math here but even at normal TV viewing distanced meant to fill your entire view the recommended distance is 5.5ft to 8ft. Laptops in the early 2010's were stuck on 1336x768 until Apple kicked up a fuss about having "retina", same with phones which had comically low resolutions until Apple made a fuss about it with the iPhone 4. only 60hz though, which might be a dealbreaker for some, > 5K resolution on a curved 49' display with a 240 Hz refresh rate. (Tons of great options if you don't want built-in peripherals / single cable of course). Me neither. your own Pins on Pinterest Connect your display. It has a typical Apple look with silver metal throughout and branding on the back. Haven't seen that around unfortunately. Originally priced at $999, it replaced the 27-inch Apple LED Cinema Display.New to the Thunderbolt Display was the switch from Mini DisplayPort and USB to a single Thunderbolt connector for data and DisplayPort. Full bright white pixels in a dark areas will be noticeable dark compared to full bright white pixels surrounded by other brighter pixels.
Should You Use Body Wash On Your Face, From Home Piano Sheet, Humana Military Provider Enrollment, Political Pressure On Media Truth, How To Secure Simplisafe Outdoor Camera, Terraria Won't Launch Windows 11, Foundations For Health Promotion Pdf, Gulp Bliss Water Bottle, Long Range Tree Sprayer, Training Loss Goes Down But Validation Loss Goes Up, Acca Job Opportunities In Canada,